sam wrote:I just shake my head at the so called theory of what this guy is talking about. Its really too bad when you think about how another atheist once again misinturpred the sciptures and tried to re define what they think it should say.
So, no Christian has ever interpreted the Bible to say what they wanted it to? Really? So it's just coincidence there's like 102 different versions of the Bible?
dvnt wrote:I guess we should all stop listening to God and start listing to folks like bill who have all the awnsers.
First off I don't think everyone listens to God anyway. Christians are straight hypocrites.
What does God's voice sound like? I think Morgan Freeman has a nice voice. I hope God's voice sounds like his.
sam wrote:There isnt and there hasnt been one atheist dead or alive that could interpred the Bible correctly nor understand it. The only thing atheist folks have contributed is confusion because they themselve refused to believe truth because they don't understand it.
What about the Christians that turned atheist? They're reading something wrong too right?
The only thing they have contributed is confusion? Really? Well I guess the whole law of gravity was a stupid, confusing notion. Or how about the fact the Earth revolves around the Sun? Or are you still so self absorbed that the Earth is in the center of the Universe?
sam wrote:History has shown that when we refuse to understand something or someone we condemn it look at racism and bigotry.
History has also shown that the Church was one of the main condemners. Anyone remember the witch hunts? Kill all free thinking women who know a little about medicine or could do a few magic tricks. Those were good times, lets go back to those days when the church reigned supreme.
So how much research are they doing on your dad? Like what kind of tests? Surely if a disease as profound as cancer just up and vanished for no apparent reason no doctor could pass up the opportunity to figure out why. Why, your father could posses the cure for cancer.
Now this part is not directed at sam:
Can't cancer cells go dormant? It's my understanding that a cancer cell is a rouge cell that has lost the means in which to steady it's reproductive process. As such, the cell divides uncontrollably, causing the masses. Would it not be possible for a cell to 'refresh'? Perhaps the cells guidelines could kick back on?
Knowledge is power.